CVE detail
CVE-2026-59247
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability in Gleam allows an adversary in the middle to substitute forged Hex package contents during dependency resolution. During dependency resolution Gleam fetches package metadata from the signature-verified Hex repository, which covers each release's dependency requirements and SHA-256 outer_checksum. After resolving versions, gleam_cli::dependencies::lookup_package makes a second request to the unsigned Hex API through gleam_core::hex::get_package_release and records the outer_checksum and dependency names from that JSON response into manifest.toml, instead of the values from the verified repository metadata. The Hex repository signature does not cover the API response. An adversary in the middle who can intercept TLS with a certificate trusted by the Gleam process (for example a TLS-inspecting proxy using a CA in the operating system trust store or added through GLEAM_CACERTS_PATH), and who can modify both the API release response and the corresponding repository tarball, can supply a package archive with a matching forged checksum without the Hex repository signing key. Gleam verifies the forged tarball against the forged checksum, accepts it, and extracts it as a dependency source, resulting in loss of integrity of the downloaded package contents. Only projects that resolve or update Hex dependencies are affected, which happens when the manifest is missing, a dependency is added or updated, or dependency requirements change. Builds that reuse an unchanged, known-good manifest.toml continue to verify tarballs against its pinned checksum. This issue affects gleam: from 0.18.0 before 1.18.0.
Buzz score
Why this CVE is surfacing
This all-time snapshot uses the same composite formula as Trending across a 30-year evidence window, rather than a current rolling window.
Buzz score components · mention 17.9 · diversity 11.5 · KEV 0.0 · OTX 0.0 · PoC 0.0
Why it matters now
Mention timeline
- Total mentions
- 5
- within the 30d window
- Peak daily
- 5
- highest bucket
Evidence
Source links by recency
5 source links · newest first
No excerpt available.
Exploitosv.devJul 29, 2026, 3:16 PMNo excerpt available.
Exploitgithub.comJul 29, 2026, 3:16 PMNo excerpt available.
Exploitgithub.comJul 29, 2026, 3:16 PMNo excerpt available.
Exploitgithub.comJul 29, 2026, 3:16 PM- https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-59247.htmlcna.erlef.org
No excerpt available.
Vendor Advisorycna.erlef.orgJul 29, 2026, 3:16 PM
Exploit code
Public exploit repository references
Public PoC repositories are third-party, potentially unsafe artifacts. Treat their code as untrusted and use it only on authorized systems in an isolated, least-privilege environment. cvebuzz does not execute the code or verify that an exploit works.
0 repository references · best confidence N/A · max 0 stars
Related records
Similar CVEs
6 related CVEs with shared weakness or product evidence
- CVE-2026-62995CVSS 2.3 · Low
joserfc is a Python library that provides an implementation of several JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE) standards. in versions 1.7.1 and prior, joserfc accepts JWTs with…
- CVE-2026-12383CVSS 7.5 · High
A flaw was found in the Event-Driven Ansible (EDA) server. The ExternalEventStreamViewSet uses permissive access controls (permission_classes=[AllowAny], authentication_classes=[]…
- CVE-2026-39155CVSS 6.5 · Medium
Knot DNS before 3.4.10 and 3.5.x before 3.5.4 contains a vulnerability in mod-onlinesign where the next NSEC owner name can be computed incorrectly. This can create an overly broa…
- CVE-2026-15615CVSS 7.5 · High
Logto omits validation of the SAML <Conditions> element, enabling attackers to strip time and audience restrictions and replay assertions indefinitely.
- CVE-2026-15612CVSS 9.1 · Critical
Logto bypasses OIDC nonce validation when the nonce claim is absent from the id_token, enabling replay of authentication tokens and weakening session-binding.
- CVE-2026-52688CVSS 7.5 · High
RRSIGs with too few labels can lead to bypass of DNSSEC wildcard validation